Seeking – and Injecting – the Illusive G-Spot
UK — Once upon a time, women were informed that they either had “mature” orgasms or they had “immature” orgasms, depending on whether they were vaginal or clitoral. The fact that most women were just happy to have any kind of orgasm didn’t enter into the equation – although the eventual discovery of the Graefenberg or G-Spot vindicated Freud’s contention that a vaginal orgasm was even possible. The exact location of the G-Spot is still debated, as is its very existence – while some women insist that they not only have one, but can boost its power with a little help from a hypodermic needle.Although G-Spot enthusiasts insist that every woman possesses one, although they contend that some women have de-sensitized theirs from lack of use, Italian researcher Emmanuele Jannini assures his colleagues that such is not the case.
According to Jannini, whose findings appear in the British weekly New Scientist, the G-Spot is a reality, but not for all women. What Jannini says he found was that although the first group of women possessed an area of thicker tissue along the front vaginal wall behind the urethra, the second group of women did not.
The University of L’Aquila researcher used ultrasound to view the vaginas of nine women who said they experienced vaginal orgasms and another 11 who had never had an orgasm they identified as vaginal. In Jannini’s opinion, “Women without any visible evidence of a G-Spot cannot have a vaginal orgasm.”
If Jannini is correct, women who have been frustrated by failed attempts at vaginal, or G-Spot, orgasms could one day undergo what he calls “a simple, rapid, and inexpensive method” for determining whether they even possess a G-Spot to stimulate, let alone milk into an ejaculation.
Skeptics assure that there’s still much research to be done on the subject, since it may not be a matter of size but of sensitivity that inspires the G-Spot to react. Others question whether there is even a distinct structure within the genitals that should be called a G-Spot and not merely an extension of the clitoris.
Ironically, given Freud’s orgasmic classifications, Jannini assures women not to worry, as “They can still have a ‘normal’ orgasm through stimulation of the clitoris.”
Women not content to focus their energies exclusively on their clitoris are taking drastic measures to enhance the pleasures their G-Spots afford them, thanks to a bizarre new social gathering called a G-Shot Party, according to ABC News.
A G-Spot Party is essentially the same thing as a Botox Party, but with the needle inserted lower and with the intention of increasing – instead of decreasing – sensitivity. Proponents insist that an injection of an untested substance into the front wall of their vagina by David Matlock, a gynecologist who created the technique and promotes it through the so-called G-Spot Parties held in his office, or one of his students.
Unlike Botox parties, which he points out tend to include alcohol in a home setting, his patients imbibe more sober liquids in a controlled environment hosted by medical professionals. They must also sign a two-page waiver with 68 risks listed, although Matlock insists he’s never heard of an injury.
“Our study showed that 87-percent of women reported enhanced sexual arousal because of an enhanced G-Spot,” he told ABC. “What we’re doing is basically talking to women in a small group about this procedure, with individual exams and procedures in the office.”
While some wonder whether it wouldn’t be better for women to bring their men to a party dedicated to G-Spot and/or clitoral stimulation instead of one dedicated to shooting a mystery medicine into their vagina, Matlock sees it as another tool of empowerment for women seeking sexual solutions.
Of course, this particular solution has an impressive price tag attached to it, with a single shot running $1,850 and a double shot ringing up at $2,500.